Khamis, 3 Ogos 2017

The Frequency of Skills Used in a Match by Winner Class B and Class E in Pencak Silat Tanding at 28th Sea Games Singapore 2015.

Nurul Afidah Binti Kasim

Faculty of Sports Science & Recreation, Universiti Teknologi MARA(UiTM) , Malaysia

Key words: kicking, punching, silat, hand notational
_____________________________________________________________________

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study is to understand the frequencies differences of skills performed within winner and loser in the primary category of Pencak Silat in Singapore SEA Games 2015. The game that had been analyzed is between Vietnam vs. Malaysia Class B Semi Final, Thailand vs. Malaysia Class B Final, Singapore vs. Malaysia Class E Semi Final, and Vietnam vs. Malaysia Class E Final in Pencak Silat Tanding. In order to figure out which skills will score more during the game. The method employed to gather data is analyzing the published video that was put up on YouTube. The activities skills that are visualized by the teams are identified. By using descriptive statistical analysis, the mean and the standard deviation for each variable is calculated from the data obtained from the video analysis. Thus, the winner has performed kicking skills more than punching skills and which hit on target.
Silat may be a standout amongst universal military on Malay society which as of now existed previous a few tens. Pencak Silat may be an interesting military that established for Malay society. Those expressions Pencak Silat also need aid consolidated to structure a intensify statement which constituted an association of the solidarity from claiming Pencak schools. Furthermore, Silat schools for Indonesia might have been established over Surakarta over 1948, which known as Ikatan Pencak Silat indonesia (The indonesian Pencak Silat Association), abbreviated as IPSI [3].
Finalized alongside preparation programs, those physiological prerequisites and understanding of the match may be obliged [1]. Pencak Silat are utilizing different aptitudes for example, punching, kicking, gagging up, make and tumble. There would few investigations that have been directed should figure out those approaches with move forward the execution. Therefore, the point of the review will be will analyze which ability will be more effective with take higher evaluations throughout the rivalry if the ability about punching alternately kicking.
A video recording of 6 male silat athletes in the Singapore SEA Games 2015 which is publicly available has been used in this analysis. The category that the author had analyzed is Pencak Silat Tanding Men's Class B of the 55kg weight category and Class E of the 70 kg weight category. The analysis is to identify the different types of skills that shown by the athlete during the selected match that had been analyzed. The video were repeated played where it is necessary and the playback had been slowed motion as the procedure to the observer to determine the frequencies of the types of case that measured from the video.
Silat exponent’s motions were coded into 2 different skills of attacking skills and were defined as follows:
Punch:
The punch ‘tumbuk’ is form of attacking is done by a closed fist of the hand hitting toward the target. In Silat, punching skills are actions that shoot the opponent either front punch or side punch towards the opponent’s bodies to win spots in the fight [9].
Kick:
The kicking skills are an attacking movement which is executed with one leg or two legs at the same time. In Silat Tanding battle, a kick can be trained at any mark of the opponent’s torso. It can be front kick, side flush, back kick or semi-circular side kick [9].
Block:
            Restricting movement begins with posture position ‘sikap pasang’: exponential standing straight with her hands whole body or close to his chest. Blocking or parrying ‘tangkisan’ can be done by using arms, elbows and leg with aim to prevent or withdraw at any attack [9].
Catch:
The catch ‘tangkapan’ carried by hand to prevent opponent from carrying out attacks. Silat exponent can prevent itself from attack he pointed to the attack have been arrested for the other direction. Capture the disorder or drags the opponent is prohibited. A catch that can solve part held such as leg and waist are prohibited. These rules exist to protect the silat exponent [9].
Topple:
There are ways to bring down an opponent down. For example, a silat exponent of ‘pesilat’ can be either push, push opponents back away from the bag or from the side, push, punch, kick, strike or punched to make your opponent off balance. Every fall is not valid as long as silat exponent topples his opponent down without wrestling or she is able to defeat an opponent that he had been brought down [9].
Sweep:
Swiping ‘sapuan’ involves attacking the opponent's feet on the ground to unstabilise him and brought down to the ground. An exponent of silat can do this movement attacking either his right or left leg. Thus, the front sweep ‘sapuan depan’ done by swinging the leg forward to push opposite front leg, while a swipe back ‘sapuan belakang’ carried out by swinging the leg backwards to hit the back leg [9].
Evade/Dodge:
The dodge ‘elakan’ silat techniques carried out by the athlete when he tried to prevent the attack. This technique does not require touching the silat exponents in fending off opponents off the attack. They are many ways to carry out his defensive movements such as dodging ‘gelek’  retreat ‘mundur’, evasion to the side ‘elak sisi’, bending ‘elak serung’. Jumping ‘lonjak’, ducking ‘susup’ and others [9].
Self-Release:
Self-release ‘lepas tangkapan’ technique is a technique to open any clinching or arrests of opponents [9].
Block and Punch:
Blocking techniques used to prevent any attack from the opponent's hands or leg and followed with a counter-attack by hand to punch the opponent [9].
Block and Kick:
Blocking techniques used to prevent any attack from the opponent's hands or leg and followed with a counter-attack using the foot to kick the opponent [9].
Block and Sweep:
Blocking techniques used to prevent any attack from the opponent's hands or leg, followed by a sweeping counter-attack technique to the opponent [9].
Fake Punch:
An action that a silat exponent intends to confuse opponents using fake punch to break his opponent's defense posture.
Fake Kick:
An action that a silat exponent intends to confuse opponents using fake kick to break his opponent's defense posture.
Others:
            Both silat opponents are either standing posture ‘sikap pasang’ or come close to each other using a pattern martial step ‘pola langkah’. All activities are considered high intensity except others were at that time the both silat opponents are in the low intensity periods [9].
Each transition of the actions was observed by the analyst. The observations of the match were done by one and half hours. In order to examine the data from the game, an experienced silat professional is needed because the game is quick and need to be more focus for each accomplishment.
            The observation generated data will be the frequency of the information collected. All the data collected are key - in into SPSS for more detailed statistical analysis. In this analysis the SPSS version 24 is being used. The descriptive test which is mean, mode, median and standard deviation are being outputted.
RESULTS
Table 1: Frequency of actions and outcomes recorded during a silat match category Men’s 55 kg Class B Semi Final- Malaysia
Action
Hit elsewhere
Hit target
Miss opponent
Not Available
Total
Block
4
4
Block and Kick
Block and Punch
Block and Sweep
3
3
6
Kick
1
4
5
Fake Kick
1
1
Punch
4
4
Fake Punch
1
1
Self-Release
Topple
Sweep
Catch
2
1
3
Dodge/Evade
6
6
Others
10
10
Total
1
17
4
18
40
*Note: Not available – means action that did not count as outcome by observer
 Others – means low intensity activities.


Table 2: Frequency of actions and outcomes recorded during a silat match category Men’s 55 kg Class B Final- Malaysia
Action
Hit elsewhere
Hit target
Miss opponent
Not Available
Total
Block
3
3
Block and Kick
Block and Punch
1
1
Block and Sweep
1
1
3
5
Kick
3
6
9
Fake Kick
1
1
Punch
7
1
8
Fake Punch
3
3
Self-Release
Topple
Sweep
Catch
2
2
Dodge/Evade
7
7
Others
20
20
Total
4
20
4
31
59

Table 3: Frequency of actions and outcomes recorded during a silat match category Men’s 70 kg Class E Semi Final- Malaysia

Outcome
Action
Hit elsewhere
Hit target
Miss opponent
Not Available
Total
Block
5
5
Block and Kick
Block and Punch
Block and Sweep
13
2
15
Kick
3
18
21
Fake Kick
4
4
Punch
5
5
Fake Punch
2
Self-Release
2
2
Topple
1
1
Sweep
1
1
Catch
3
1
4
Dodge/Evade
14
14
Others
20
20
Total
3
48
3
40
94

Table 4: Frequency of actions and outcomes recorded during a silat match category Men’s 70 kg Class E Final- Malaysia

Outcome
Action
Hit elsewhere
Hit target
Miss opponent
Not Available
Total
Block
1
1
Block and Kick
Block and Punch
Block and Sweep
10
2
12
Kick
4
7
5
16
Fake Kick
Punch
Fake Punch
Self-Release
1
1
Topple
1
1
Sweep
Catch
13
1
14
Dodge/Evade
23
23
Others
23
23
Total
4
34
9
46
93


Table 5: Frequency profile of the contestants
Exponent
Block
Kick
Other*
Total
Men's 55 Kg Class B Semi Final
Vietnam
4
10
42
56
Malaysia
10
6
24
40
Men's 55 Kg Class B Final
Thailand
1
13
35
49
Malaysia
9
10
40
59
Men's 70 Kg Class E Semi Final
Singapore
7
23
32
62
Malaysia
20
25
49
94
Men's 70 Kg Class E  Final
Vietnam
3
26
52
81
Malaysia
             15            
16
62
93
Total
69
129
336
534
*Note: ‘Other’ here refers to other activities than block and kick.

Table 6: The mean, standard deviation and frequency of skills used in a match by winner and loser Class B and Class E in Pencak Silat Tanding at 28th Sea Games Singapore 2015
Category
Exponent
Winner
Exponent
Loser
Class B Semi Final
Malaysia
40
Vietnam
56
Class B Final
Malaysia
59
Thailand
49
Class E Semi Final
Malaysia
94
Singapore
62
Class E Final
Malaysia
93
Malaysia
81
Total
286
248
Mean
71.5
62
Standard deviation

26.57

13.73
Variance (standard deviation)

705.67

188.66
Population standard deviation

23.00

11.89
Variance (population standard deviation

529.25

141.5


            Based on results of Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, and Table 4 shows the frequency of actions and outcomes recorded during a silat match category by a winner. All the 4 matches of class B and D are being conquered by Malaysia. It shows athletes from Malaysia are dominant to control an opponent during the match. All the data recorded shows that the winners were consist of kicking and punching action. However, the percentage of block and sweep was greater than percentage of punches. Although the punching frequency is lower than the kick, hit the target high percentage shows that punching is the most successful action for a silat exponent to get a point in the competition [9].
All athletes perform movements in silat when the competition is held to earn points. Most movements required anaerobic energy system. In other words is explosive movement that’s means the movement requires 0-15 seconds. It can be assumed that the source of anaerobic contribute to the metabolic demand during the work spent performing high intensity activity such as punching, kicking, blocking, dodging, shooting, swiping, and dropping. During low intensity activities both athletes have been deemed to have committed acts of low activity such as "sikap pasang" posture or come close to each other using martial step pattern "pola langkah" [9].
The winners can performs better lower body movement such as kicking and swiping as a ways of toppling down opponents. According to Aziz et al. [1] reported that compared with judo and taekwondo, silat athletes have better leg power and is capable of performing in a short period with high intensity. To taking down the opponent is not easy because the pesilat need to have a really good skill of how to taking down the opponent.
Table 5 recorded all the frequency of skills used in a match in silat for class B and E category. Total skill used in all matches is 534 skills. The dominant of skill used by the pesilat is kicking skills.                     
Table 6 shows the summary of the data such as mean and standard deviation (SD). The mean values for winner is higher compare to loser opponents which is total 71.5 and 62 respectively. It shown that the winner used more skills motion compares to the loser. The SD values for winners are 26.57 and 13.73 for the loser.
Based on the data recorded, the winner’s performances are dominant to kicking skill. However, they need to practice to strengthen their ability. The pesilat also need to improve their skill related fitness because it is important to develop the skills that contribute to scoring points in addition to developing the metabolic system involved in the martial arts competition [9].
            As conclusion, from this match, the skills that often been used in “Silat Pencak Tanding” is punching skills as the result above shown the situation. From the analysis above, the author show the understanding of the divergences between the attacking skills had been frequently practiced among men athletes.. The men athletes also use more kick, hit on target attacking compare using punching skills in attacking their opponent. By using kicking skills as they can mark points to gain the match because kicking skills can be performed on any body part so he can score point easily but far above match analyzed.

RECOMMENDATION

                Silat is the ancient South East Asian martial art that encompasses hand-to-hand combat as well as weaponry. For producing the best silat fighters and champions in the country is not an easy job. The pesilat need to be creative in visualization. Many pro fighters and others use this technique because your mind can control your body. Control your mind, you control your body. This is combat conditioning for the mind.

REFERENCES

  1. Aziz, A. R., Tan, B., & Teh, K. C. (2002). Physiological responses during matches and profile of elite pencak silat exponents. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 1, 147-155.


  1. Franchini, E., Brito, C. J., & Artioli, G. G. (2012). Weight loss in combat sports: Physiological, psychological and performance effects. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 9(1), 52.

  1. Kartomi, M. (2011). Traditional and modern forms of pencak silat in indonesia: The suku mamak in riau. Musicology Australia, 33(1), 47-68.

  1. Kim, S., Andrew, D. P., & Greenwell, T. C. (2009). An analysis of spectator motives and media consumption behaviour in an individual combat sport: Cross-national differences between american and south korean mixed martial arts fans. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 10(2), 53-66.

  1. Kim, S., Greenwell, T. C., Andrew, D. P., Lee, J., & Mahony, D. F. (2008). An analysis of spectator motives in an individual combat sport: A study of mixed martial arts fans. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 17(2), 109.

  1. Lenetsky, S., Nates, R. J., Brughelli, M., & Harris, N. K. (2015). Is effective mass in combat sports punching above its weight? Human Movement Science, 40, 89-97. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2014.11.016


  1. Nosanchuk, T., & MacNeil, M. (1989). Examination of the effects of traditional and modern martial arts training on aggressiveness. Aggressive Behavior, 15(2), 153-159.


  1. Pencak Silat Tanding Men's Class B Final THA vs MAS (Day 9) | 28th SEA Games Singapore 2015. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YsMd2SM4so&spfreload=10


  1. Pencak Silat Tanding Men's Class B Semi-Final MAS vs VIE(Day 8) | 28th SEA Games Singapore 2015. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jov7GP_RcrI&t=12s

  1. Pencak Silat Tanding Men's Class E Final VIE vs MAS (Day 9) | 28th SEA Games Singapore 2015. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGK1CSVk0qs

  1. Pencak Silat Tanding Men's Class E Semi-Final SIN vs MAS (Day 8) | 28th SEA Games Singapore 2015. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L62CI3MJ-8A

  1. Pettersson, S., Pipping Ekström, M., & Berg, C. M. (2012). The food and weight combat. A problematic fight for the elite combat sports athlete. Appetite, 59(2), 234-242. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.05.007

  1. Shapie, M. M., Oliver, J., O’Donoghue, P., & Tong, R. (2013). Activity profile during action time in national silat competition. Journal of Combat Sports and Martial Arts., 1(2), 81-86.

  1. Shirani, G., Motamedi, M. H. K., Ashuri, A., & Eshkevari, P. S. (2010). Prevalence and patterns of combat sport related maxillofacial injuries. Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock, 3(4), 314.

  1. Williams N, O’Donoghue PG. Techniques used in mixed-martial arts competition. In: Dancs H, Hughes M, O’Donoghue PG, editors. (2006) Performance          Analysis of Sport 7. 23rd-26th August 2006, Szombathely, Hungary.          Cardiff: CPA UWIC Press; 2006, 369-375






terima kasih baca . jangan lupa komen ! ;)